ChatGPT decline, is it a temporary incident or regularity
ChatGPT decline.
The traffic worldwide decreased by nearly 10 percent from May to June. Data firm, Sensor Tower, reported that ChatGPT’s iPhone app downloads have been steadily dipping since they peaked in early June.
To see important ads, turn off your ad blocker! Article continued below:Suggested, could be a sign that consumer interest in chatbots and other AI tools is waning as tech companies heavily invest in AI product development.
Earlier this year, ChatGPT set a record for attracting the fastest-growing user base in history.
Many tech companies—most prominently Google—immediately sought to replicate ChatGPT’s success. ChatGPT’s success may have been less about broad interest in chatbots and more about its novelty, which may now be wearing off.
As an example that ChatGPT may have simply benefited from increasing user adoption rates, this week, Meta launched a Twitter rival called Threads.
ChatGPT decline and Threads.
Almost instantly, Threads—despite significant drawbacks in its design and ample privacy concerns—easily beat ChatGPT’s record as the fastest-growing consumer app.
Where ChatGPT reached 100 million users in two months, Threads hit 70 million users in less than two days, CNBC reported. And Meta did that without depending on any flashy new AI features (in fact, Twitter has sued, alleging that Threads is just a Twitter copycat).
Whether a 10 percent in ChatGPT decline users over a single month in summer should worry tech companies going all in on chatbots is still unclear, though.
The Post suggested various reasons why ChatGPT decline might be experiencing user drop-off, including a theoretical dip in the chatbot’s quality as its popularity drove up costs to keep it running, and OpenAI attempted tweaks to lower expenses.
It could even be meaningful that fewer students need to write academic papers in the summer months.
ChatGPT decline, Drama.
But ChatGPT has also dealt with user drama, including a recent lawsuit and an increasing number of companies urging employees not to use tools like ChatGPT out of privacy concerns, including Apple.
OpenAI also started responding to user backlash and regulatory pressure by censoring harmful ChatGPT responses, which may have led some users to abandon the tool, possibly viewing it as less useful, less trustworthy, or simply less fun.
More and more companies are releasing their own AI chat bots that are more niche and targeted for specific applications.
Users frustrated by ChatGPT guardrails.
There’s no denying that regulatory pressure on chatbot makers like OpenAI and Google has increased, with lawmakers globally cautioning AI companies to do more to curb the harm of new technologies.
ChatGPT decline, guardrails.
Because of that pressure, AI tools like ChatGPT now have guardrails in place that limit chatbots from responding to prompts with problematic content like misinformation, harmful instructions, biased viewpoints, or hateful content.
One uncensored chatbot, WizardLM-Uncensored, was developed by a laid-off Microsoft employee, Eric Hartford. He has argued that there’s a need for uncensored chatbots, partly because they have valid uses, like helping a TV writer research a violent scene.
What are ChatGPT’s restrictions on racial hatred, misinformation and hate speech?
ChatGPT’s responded to me quickly.
As an AI language model, I am designed to follow ethical guidelines set by OpenAI. I do not generate or promote content that includes racial hatred, misinformation, or hate speech. I strive to provide helpful and accurate information while being respectful and inclusive.
OpenAI has made efforts to reduce biased behavior and improve the safety and reliability of AI systems. However, it’s important to note that as a language model, I can sometimes generate responses that may not be entirely accurate or may reflect the biases present in the data I was trained on.
OpenAI continues to work on developing ways to mitigate these issues and ensure the responsible use of AI technology. If you come across any content that violates ethical guidelines, please let me know, and I’ll do my best to address it appropriately.
All The Best!
I played with Bing’s chatbot, and I found it completely unusable if you want to have a conversion with it, due to censorship. I could maybe understand censoring controversial stuff, or harmful information.
But even trivial stuff, like discussing Asimov robot novels, was almost impossible.
OK, let’s say I was asking the “wrong” questions. The problem is that even some of the questions it suggests itself were sometimes censored, either by replying that it can’t discuss that subject and we should discuss something else, or even by reverting some long piece of text after writing half it, probably when it “realizes” that the full answer will contain some blacklisted information.
Short story writers, on the other hand, will eagerly delve into any and all specialist knowledge hobbies and interests in order to write about it. Some of them are fucking obsessive about details and don’t want to trust a chatbot