Elon Musk, OpenAI risks humanity’s consciousness
A few words about Elon Musk. Why Elon Musk is smarter than others? What sets Elon Musk apart is his unique combination of intelligence, creativity, and ambition, as well as his willingness to take risks and pursue audacious goals.Possible place for your ads! Serious advertiser welcome! Send us an email, to agree!
Elon Musk, what is HE?
He has a remarkable ability to identify problems and opportunities, and to come up with innovative solutions that others have not considered.
Additionally, Musk is known for his exceptional work ethic and his ability to motivate and inspire others to work towards his vision. He has a clear sense of purpose and a long-term perspective, and he is willing to devote significant time and resources to achieve his goals.
In short, while Elon Musk is undoubtedly a highly intelligent and capable individual, his success is due to a combination of factors, including his unique talents, hard work, and the ability to inspire and lead others. Elon Musk, bad qualities and decisions
Some of the criticisms leveled against him include.
Poor treatment of employees:
There have been reports of long hours and difficult working conditions at some of Musk’s companies, such as Tesla and SpaceX. In addition, he has been criticized for anti-union rhetoric and for firing employees who attempt to organize.
Musk has been known to engage in risky behavior, such as tweeting about sensitive company information, making inappropriate comments on social media, and smoking marijuana during a podcast interview.
Questionable business practices:
Musk has been accused of exaggerating the capabilities of his companies, making false or misleading statements to investors, and engaging in unethical business practices.
While Musk is known for promoting environmentally-friendly technology, some have criticized the environmental impact of his companies, such as the environmental damage caused by lithium mining for electric car batteries.
Now he is against OpenAI.
On 22 March more than 1,800 signatories – including Musk, the cognitive scientist Gary Marcus, and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak – called for a six-month pause on the development of systems “more powerful” than that of GPT-4. Engineers from Amazon, DeepMind, Google, Meta and Microsoft also lent their support.
Developed by OpenAI, a company co-founded by Musk and now backed by Microsoft, GPT-4 has developed the ability to hold human-like conversation, compose songs and summarise lengthy documents. Such AI systems with “human-competitive intelligence” pose profound risks to humanity, the letter claimed.
Elon Musk joins call for pause in creation of giant AI ‘digital minds’.
“AI labs and independent experts should use this pause to jointly develop and implement a set of shared safety protocols for advanced AI design and development that are rigorously audited and overseen by independent outside experts,” the letter said.
The Future of Life institute, the thinktank that coordinated the effort, cited 12 pieces of research from experts including university academics as well as current and former employees of OpenAI, Google and its subsidiary DeepMind. But four experts cited in the letter have expressed concern that their research was used to make such claims.
When initially launched, the letter lacked verification protocols for signing and racked up signatures from people who did not actually sign it, including Xi Jinping and Meta’s chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, who clarified on Twitter he did not support it.
Critics have accused the Future of Life Institute (FLI), which is primarily funded by the Musk Foundation, of prioritising imagined apocalyptic scenarios over more immediate concerns about AI – such as racist or sexist biases being programmed into the machines.
Among the research cited was “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots”, a well-known paper co-authored by Margaret Mitchell, who previously oversaw ethical AI research at Google. Mitchell, now chief ethical scientist at AI firm Hugging Face, criticised the letter, telling Reuters it was unclear what counted as “more powerful than GPT4”.
“By treating a lot of questionable ideas as a given, the letter asserts a set of priorities and a narrative on AI that benefits the supporters of FLI,” she said. “Ignoring active harms right now is a privilege that some of us don’t have.”
Her co-authors Timnit Gebru and Emily M Bender criticised the letter on Twitter, with the latter branding some of its claims as “unhinged”. Shiri Dori-Hacohen, an assistant professor at the University of Connecticut, also took issue with her work being mentioned in the letter. She last year co-authored a research paper arguing the widespread use of AI already posed serious risks.
Her research argued the present-day use of AI systems could influence decision-making in relation to climate change, nuclear war, and other existential threats.
She told Reuters: “AI does not need to reach human-level intelligence to exacerbate those risks.”
“There are non-existential risks that are really, really important, but don’t receive the same kind of Hollywood-level attention.”
Asked to comment on the criticism, FLI president Max Tegmark said both short-term and long-term risks of AI should be taken seriously.
Good Day You!